<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Samsung UN55B6000 Review – 55-inch LED HDTV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hdtvuniverse.com/lcd-tv-reviews/samsung-un55b6000-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hdtvuniverse.com/lcd-tv-reviews/samsung-un55b6000-review/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=samsung-un55b6000-review</link>
	<description>HDTV Reviews, News &#38; Guides</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 17:25:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrel</title>
		<link>http://www.hdtvuniverse.com/lcd-tv-reviews/samsung-un55b6000-review/#comment-4049</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 15:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youreviewelectronics.com/?p=1707#comment-4049</guid>
		<description>I finished a user review just yesterday concerning the UN55B6000 Samsung. 
My review diappeared from the posting. My concern is if you have a product that is defective and it gets a negative review it should be left for all to see. After all, spending $3000 on a upscale tv isn&#039;t something we do everyday and when it only operates for 1 1/2 monts and is completely dead. One can see how the buyer would be a little upset. It&#039;s a good thing I have my Vizio to watch the college bowl games today. All my friends will have to get a little closer to the smaller tv and ask me. Why didn&#039;t you just buy another Vizio ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I finished a user review just yesterday concerning the UN55B6000 Samsung.<br />
My review diappeared from the posting. My concern is if you have a product that is defective and it gets a negative review it should be left for all to see. After all, spending $3000 on a upscale tv isn&#8217;t something we do everyday and when it only operates for 1 1/2 monts and is completely dead. One can see how the buyer would be a little upset. It&#8217;s a good thing I have my Vizio to watch the college bowl games today. All my friends will have to get a little closer to the smaller tv and ask me. Why didn&#8217;t you just buy another Vizio ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrel</title>
		<link>http://www.hdtvuniverse.com/lcd-tv-reviews/samsung-un55b6000-review/#comment-4048</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 23:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youreviewelectronics.com/?p=1707#comment-4048</guid>
		<description>I purchased this unit about 1/12 months ago. Just sent off my second payment and the unit is Dead!!! Already need a service call.  Go ahead and spend $3,000 on junk? I&#039;ve had a 37&quot; Vizio for over a year and it works fine  at the fraction of the cost. I should have saved my money. Good thing it went out before I bragged about it at first. Another family memeber wanted to buy one. They changed their mind already not to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I purchased this unit about 1/12 months ago. Just sent off my second payment and the unit is Dead!!! Already need a service call.  Go ahead and spend $3,000 on junk? I&#8217;ve had a 37&#8243; Vizio for over a year and it works fine  at the fraction of the cost. I should have saved my money. Good thing it went out before I bragged about it at first. Another family memeber wanted to buy one. They changed their mind already not to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: www.hdtvuniverse.com @ 2012-05-22 16:35:26 -->
